Skip to main content

Trust Indicators and Fake News

It is no secret that we have a significant "Fake News" problem in the world today. Before everyone starts preparing their defenses for their favorite news sources, let me clarify that I am not talking about "Biased News". As much as President Trump likes to say it, CNN is not actually "Fake News" and neither is FOX, NBC, ABC, et cetera. Biased as these sites may be at times (mostly all the time), the news they are reporting is based in fact; it just has a very biased spin. I would think that functioning adults would be able to tell the difference between:
"Trump signs healthcare reform in to law causing issues for middle-class"
and
"Trump seen punching babies on his way out of gentleman's club"

While there is no way for me to know if the second statement ever happened (I highly doubt it), I would assume that most people would understand that one is fake and one is biased. Unfortunately, we seem to have reached a point that people either don't care if something is fake because it supports their tightly-held beliefs, or people really just can't tell the difference. I personally believe that are country is in crisis if the latter if true.

Technology companies, especially those that foster news sharing such as Facebook and Google, have finally begun to combat the problem. As I read on Engadget (link below), these companies have gotten many of the top news providers to agree to "Trust Indicators" next to their articles. These indicators will show information about the story, journalist, and provider. Their hope is that people will see this information, read it, and actually make smart decisions based on this information.

My thoughts on this are that this may be all for naught. My experience with many that read most of these "shady" articles do not care about the source or even the journalist. Their thoughts are that these articles reinforce their biases and allow them to feel more secure in their beliefs. The idea that those with hardcore beliefs strong enough to read (and believe) these outrageous stories are going to suddenly see reason seems pretty far-fetched.

However, I will ask you. What are your thoughts on indicators on articles designed to weed out "Fake News"? Do you believe that this will actually make an impact, or is this going to just be another exercise in insanity for thinking the consumption of these stories can be stopped?


Engadget link: https://www.engadget.com/2017/11/16/facebook-google-and-others-add-trust-icons-to-tackle-fake-news/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are Chromebooks right for Mom?

With Mother's day coming up, many people will be looking for that perfect gift which many times can be a new laptop. However, there are thousands of options based on size, color, storage capacity, ram, et cetera. The most important starting point is operating system. Now, if you have a ton of money or just really love your mother (joking!), you could opt for the Macbook or iPad. They are excellent "computers" for everyday tasks that would be perfect, but unfortunately, that will set you back a few months of rent or mortgage or whatever. So, while I have no issue with Apple, and I actually love the simplistic design, I may advise against that. So, that leaves you with either the old reliable Windows PCs of which there are many or the somewhat newcomer that is the Chromebook. Now, Chromebooks tend to be cheaper and run faster, but are they really the right choice for Mom (or you if you choose to treat yourself)? The first question to ask is, "what do you do with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Checking in on me?

Admittedly, it has been a slower news day in my tech sphere, and I have not had a ton of time to do more research. But I find myself wondering tonight: how many people check in, and do you think it is a good idea to do so? While I understand privacy concerns, I leave my life mainly open for the public. I tend to share my life with the world through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. At any given time, those in my circle on social media know where I am, what I am doing, and who I am doing it with. Why do I do this  you ask? Is it vanity of making others jealous, or is it simply to let others know? Well, honestly, it is a little both. The most important issue others see with this lifestyle is that I am letting the entire world know where I am. I get the hesitation with checking in on social media. For instance, if someone would wish to harm me for some strange reason, they would know where to find me. Also, if someone would desire to rob me, they would know that I am not home. T...
Post a Comment
Read more

In-display sensors or facial scanners: which will take off?

The fingerprint sensor may be moving back to the front...under the screen. Could this be the next big trend in mobile technology (see previous entry about current trend)? Or, will companies move the Apple way and opt for facial recognition for security? With the debut of the iPhone X, Apple shifted away from the fingerprint sensor and debuted FaceID. Utilizing (arguably) some of the most advanced cameras and sensors, the iPhone X negated the need for fingerprint, bio-metric security by using 3D facial recognition to verify identity. In doing so, the home button vanished from the iPhone along with the ability to scan fingerprints. Several months later, at CES, Vivo demoed the first phone using in-display fingerprint scanner technology ; the idea being to remove bezels on the front as well remove the sensor from the back of the body. Prior to CES, many believed that Samsung would be the first to debut the technology, but they were held back by mass-producing and technological restra...
Post a Comment
Read more