Skip to main content

Initial thoughts: Hogwarts Mystery

As a kid, I loved Hogwarts and the wizarding world; hell, as an adult, I still do. There is really something magical about that fictional world (pun intended). I have read every book (multiple times, including The Cursed Child), seen every movie (multiple times, including Fantastic Beasts), played every video game, and bought almost every toy from action figures to Lego sets. Because of that love, until Niantic's Wizards Unite allows me to be an AR wizard, I decided I would spend my time at Hogwarts in the mobile game Hogwarts Mystery. Having played fairly steadily for two days, here are my initial reactions.

Starting the game was exactly as I imagined. I got to create my character and head to Diagon Alley where I met my first friend (Rowan). I really did enjoy getting my wand, visiting Flourish and Blotts, and seeing those familiar Cobblestone streets. However, it was when I got to the Great Hall for the Sorting Ceremony that my nostalgia really kicked in. As I have wanted to do my whole life, I went to the Ravenclaw house for the intelligent individuals (don't judge me).

Seeing the professors, going to classes, and, of course, getting harassed by a Slytherin student with Death Eater parents made the game all the more familiar to me, and I was really enjoying the experience...until I got trapped by Devil's Snare. I thought this process would be a simple procedure: trace the line to cast Lumos, tap on the actions, repeat, and be on my way. That was when I ran out of energy for the first time, and, sure enough, I had to either wait for it to replenish or purchase some more. It was at this moment that I remembered what kind of game I was playing.

Can I complain too much about having to wait to continue playing a fun and free game? Not really. But then again, I was so determined for this to be a good game until I realized that it was essentially just another blast-from-the-past character licensed by an independent company offering a free game in exchange for people buying in-game purchases to be better than their friends (Super Mario Run anyone?). I really wanted this game to be great as a Harry Potter super-fan, but the realization that this game is meant to get you to spent money on that nostalgia really makes it come crashing down to Earth. People have been waiting years for the experience of being themselves at Hogwarts, and this game provided the first opportunity to do it. But is this all we get with that experience?

The game really is not that bad, and I have only been playing it for two days now. Maybe it will turn out to be a great game, and my initial reaction will be wrong. However, it is only two days in, and I am already tired of running out of energy in the middle of learning a spell or making a potion. My nostalgia and love of the wizarding world will keep me coming back for sure, but as of right now, I am not so sure it will be enough to have me recommend it to others.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Where do tablets belong?

Last night, I had a sudden thought: where does my tablet belong in my tech life? I have always loved the thought of having a need and purpose for every piece of technology I own. For instance, my computer does all of my heavy lifting (photo and video editing) while my phone does all of communicating and daily living tasks. My Chromecast ? That is for tossing music and videos to my TV. Google Home Mini ? What a great little assistant for quick information and getting my day started. I use my Xbox for gaming while my Huawei Watch gives me quick updates and almost-hands-free communication. So, where does my Kindle come in? I originally bought my Kindle Fire to be a consumption device and makeshift pseudo-laptop as mine is not very portable. I thought I would use it for all of Netflix watching as I moved about the house as well as for reading plenty of books; I even intended it to be useful to bang out a quick blog post or article. We probably had a great relationship at first...and ...

Digital well-being is the trend of the year

Digital well-being is this year's buzzword With the keynote of WWDC officially over, it is safe to say one thing: digital well-being is the trendy topic of the year. I/O last month and WWDC have demonstrated that the key players in mobile devices (seemingly) want you to put your phone down. However, which company has the right idea in how to do it? Both iOS 12 and Android P have showcased coming features to address "digital well-being". For all intents and purposes, these words just mean that Apple and Google "want" you to spend less time on your phone; at least, that is the image they are portraying. Both iOS and Android offer new dashboards Now, how are they both doing it? While they differ in the approach, they have very similar tools. For instance, both operating systems will allow you to set timers on apps so that you can spend as much or as little times in those apps as you choose. If you go over, you get shut out of the app. In additio...

In-display sensors or facial scanners: which will take off?

The fingerprint sensor may be moving back to the front...under the screen. Could this be the next big trend in mobile technology (see previous entry about current trend)? Or, will companies move the Apple way and opt for facial recognition for security? With the debut of the iPhone X, Apple shifted away from the fingerprint sensor and debuted FaceID. Utilizing (arguably) some of the most advanced cameras and sensors, the iPhone X negated the need for fingerprint, bio-metric security by using 3D facial recognition to verify identity. In doing so, the home button vanished from the iPhone along with the ability to scan fingerprints. Several months later, at CES, Vivo demoed the first phone using in-display fingerprint scanner technology ; the idea being to remove bezels on the front as well remove the sensor from the back of the body. Prior to CES, many believed that Samsung would be the first to debut the technology, but they were held back by mass-producing and technological restra...