Skip to main content

Freedom v.s. Lock-down: Monitoring Child Technology

I would say this question is really meant for parents and guardians: How closely do you monitor your child's internet access?

I can honestly say that this is something I have thought about quite extensively, and I just cannot come to an accurate answer. Admittedly, I am not a parent yet so I have never had to address this personally, but as an individual with extensive interest in technology, I wonder how people address internet safety and security.

For instance, I have basically witnessed both sides of the spectrum in terms of monitoring. Some people believe that kids need "big brother" watching every single thing that a child does. This includes closely monitoring (or banning) social media, daily reading text messages, child blocks on sites, et cetera. I understand that many view this as necessary to protect children from situations they are not mature enough to handle. Trust me, I get it; it is a scary world. People want to protect children at all costs and see this as necessary to do this. However, I would argue this: could you be creating more problems than you are preventing. This method essentially says that you have zero trust in the children that you raised, and you cannot rely on your children to make good choices. There are good and bad things to being overprotective, but I caution you with this advice: "Overbearing parents create sneaky children".

On the other hand, I have seen where parents and guardians are willing to give near full autonomy to children; these parents monitor very little to nothing. Most of the time, these children have full privacy with their devices and have endless social media accounts nearly unmonitored. Some would see this type of parenting as horrendous and neglectful. "How can you not monitor your children," they say. I also get that point; children are often not mature to deal with the consequences of the actions they may take. On the other hand, these parents see that allowing their children freedom to be individuals may lead to them being more open with their parents. Basically, we are trusting you to make the right decisions while also trusting that the children feel the freedom to come to them with any problems. You may argue against this, but there is some logic here.

Just remember: it is not a black and white issue. I am sure most people fall somewhere in the middle of this scale as they try (often successfully) to walk the line between trusting and not being stupid. I am genuinely interested to see how parents view this issue and how they handle it. Feel free to discuss in the comments.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Self-Driving Cars

The future of the world seems to be autonomous. We have reached a point that the future is going to be in Artificial Intelligence; Google has even said they are an AI-first company. The idea behind this push is for machines to learn and adapt to our needs. We want machines to work easily for us. One category of machines that is being pushed to work for us (and without us) is automobiles. Even when transportation consisted of horses pulling a buggy, humans have always been "behind the wheel". By that, I mean that humans have always controlled where, when, why, and how a vehicle will be moving. We have now reached a point where the future will consist of cars that control speed and direction without the need for human control. Aside from convenience, the main reason for the push: removing human error. It is no surprise that the vast majority of automobile accidents can be traced back to human error. Whether it is not watching the road, driving too fast, or simple reckless b...

Roseanne, Roseanne. Thank you for demonstrating why you should think before posting

IMAGE: Getty Images (Composite from PageSix) A while back, I wrote a piece encouraging people to be mindful of their digital footprint and the things they say and do on social media. As someone who has seen some very questionable things posted online, I thought it was important to encourage others to take caution with what they share. As for those who are forced to see and hear another's ridiculous thoughts, I wrote a  piece  just days ago about the ability to unfollow and avoid others so that you are not forced to suffer through their farcical thoughts. Now, imagine my delight this morning, when I happen to stumble upon article after article detailing the nonsensical and inflammatory remarks on Twitter made by this country's most obnoxious T.V. mom. For those who may not have caught up on the news this morning, Roseanne Barr decided to enjoy her Memorial Day weekend by tweeting every ridiculous thought to come through her narrow mind ranging from accusations against Geo...

iPhone 7

It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...