Skip to main content

Teenagers are not that interested in Facebook



Image result for teens and social media
Numerous social media companies fight for teens attention
Not long ago, a study was conducted detailing the social media usage of teenagers, and surprisingly (or not), Facebook did not come in at the top of the list. In fact, Facebook came in at the center of the pack with only 51% of teenagers using the platform. Compared to the 85% for YouTube and 72% for Instagram, Facebook is fading quickly from the forefront of social gathering.

(Note: Instagram is owned by Facebook)

The real question is, "why are teens abandoning the platform?" To me, it is not a simple as a single reason, but more a combination of factors. Firstly, the platform has quickly diluted and lost the "coolness" it once had. Now, not to insult anyone, but no teenager or tween wants to share their life and spend their time on a platform that their parents or grandparents are on. Once upon a time, Myspace was the overrun platform and Facebook was young and fresh; if you look today, I am sure most people will find that their parents/grandparents occupy more of their timeline than their friends do.
Studies show YouTube is the most popular platform for Teens
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Another reason for the decline of Facebook is the competition in the sector. When Facebook ran over Myspace on its way to the top, it really only had AIM to partially compete against; it then enjoyed a nice, long run at the top. However, compare that time with the landscape today where most find their time split between Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat; hell, even Google+ managed to carve out a small niche of the market. The market for social media is a crowded one that gets inundated with new, hungry competitors on a daily basis.

The biggest concern with the amount of competition is the content and space they can offer. Most people, especially younger people, love visual media which Facebook is far from the best at. If you want to view and post pictures, you are heading to Instagram first; for videos, YouTube offers the best platform. For quick messages and pictures, Snapchat offers an excellent app, and Twitter is the king of quick updates. Facebook, while trying to be the king of everything, has allowed challengers to make a home in each section of its country. Rather than focus on what it was the best at, it tried to be a jack-of-all-trades much like Apple before the return of Steve.

Does Facebook still have a product to offer in today's world? Of course. Marketplace, in my opinion, was one of the best additions to the platform since its creation, and event invites are still a prime way to organize events. However, if they continue trying to do too much (like with Messenger), they may find an aging clientele with no new prospects; scandals such as Cambridge Analytica are certainly not helping their cause either.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

iPhone 7

It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...

Trust Indicators and Fake News

It is no secret that we have a significant "Fake News" problem in the world today. Before everyone starts preparing their defenses for their favorite news sources, let me clarify that I am not talking about "Biased News". As much as President Trump likes to say it, CNN is not actually "Fake News" and neither is FOX, NBC, ABC, et cetera. Biased as these sites may be at times (mostly all the time), the news they are reporting is based in fact; it just has a very biased spin. I would think that functioning adults would be able to tell the difference between: "Trump signs healthcare reform in to law causing issues for middle-class" and "Trump seen punching babies on his way out of gentleman's club" While there is no way for me to know if the second statement ever happened (I highly doubt it), I would assume that most people would understand that one is fake and one is biased. Unfortunately, we seem to have reached a point that peop...

Mobile payments are the future, but how long will it take for us to get there?

We are all understandably protective of our money right? We conceal our cash when we are forced to open our wallets, keep our pin numbers to ourselves, and certainly do not just hand our credit cards off to just anyway. So, along those lines, I am curious how we as a society feel about mobile payments. Now, because I try to keep this blog open and understandable to all, I will not talk about the encryption of mobile payment nor the process of virtual card numbers and the like. I am curious as to the perception of the average person. Personally, I am all for mobile payment, and I love the convenience of simply pulling out my phone and then being on my way. I never have to worry about pulling out my card, trying to figure out whether to slide it or insert it, typing in my number, putting my pin number in, pulling it back out and in my wallet, and putting my wallet away; when I am waiting in line, I often already have my phone out anyway. There is so much potential in mobile payment. ...