Skip to main content

Are fitness trackers truly for health benefits, or have they just become a trendy fashion piece?

An avid fitness fan as well as tech enthusiast, I love fitness apps and trackers. They manage to combine my love of staying healthy and tech obsession perfectly. Throughout my day, my Huawei Watch linked with Google Fit pretty perfectly tracks my steps and movement, and then come exercise time, my Fitbit Charge 2 is a perfectly capable helper.

I have noticed that as I talk to people, I find myself immediately checking their wrists for fitness trackers because I find myself genuinely curious how much people truly utilize them. While I make no judgements on a person's appearance or lifestyle, I have noticed people that where them daily seem to make little progress on their fitness goals. Again, everyone is different and weight is not the overall indicator of health, it does make me wonder whether fitness trackers have become, like other electronics, more about appearance than health.

While I have not delved entirely in to all of the settings of either Google Fit or Fitbit, I do know that there is much more to them than just step tracking. For instance, one can track sleep, heart rate, calories, and even set reminders to move. When set up with an exercise routine, it can make sure you are getting the most benefit by checking vitals. Even with all of that, for those who use them for step tracking, are you really checking it for health benefits.

On my Fitbit, I have reminders set that if I remain sedentary for too long, it basically tells me to quit being lazy. If I want to maximize my health, I need to keep moving. Do all fitness tracker people take advantage of this? If you look down and see that you only took 5000 steps that day, are you getting up to move?

I may be the odd one in all of this, but I feel a sense of guilt if I don't see the number I am looking for. My watch, as well as my Fitbit, remind me to move so that I can attempt to stay healthy. I know many that use these devices for exactly what they were created for, and yet, I also see many that seem to be oblivious to the health benefits they can bring. This makes me wonder if fitness trackers are still mainly a tool to stay healthy or if they have become a trendy wearable that people like to show off.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Where, oh where did all of my wires go?

As I read through the comments on various mobile phone articles, I always see the same complaints: "Where is the headphone jack?" "No headphone jack? No thanks" "If it ain't broken, why fix it?" While I originally shared their contempt, I have since come to question where is all of this hate for less wires coming from? I admit that I am definitely not an audiophile, but in my opinion, Bluetooth headphones have come a long way and sound pretty solid to me. More importantly, looking at the bigger picture, haven't we been in love with the idea of losing wires for decades? As I write this blog from a wireless computer with a wireless keyboard navigated with a wireless mouse, I am reminded that we have been removing wires from everything possible for a very long time, and while there may have been resistance at the time, we have adopted this concept in to the norm. As a young kid, I remember growing up with a clear "house phone" (a rarit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Digital well-being is the trend of the year

Digital well-being is this year's buzzword With the keynote of WWDC officially over, it is safe to say one thing: digital well-being is the trendy topic of the year. I/O last month and WWDC have demonstrated that the key players in mobile devices (seemingly) want you to put your phone down. However, which company has the right idea in how to do it? Both iOS 12 and Android P have showcased coming features to address "digital well-being". For all intents and purposes, these words just mean that Apple and Google "want" you to spend less time on your phone; at least, that is the image they are portraying. Both iOS and Android offer new dashboards Now, how are they both doing it? While they differ in the approach, they have very similar tools. For instance, both operating systems will allow you to set timers on apps so that you can spend as much or as little times in those apps as you choose. If you go over, you get shut out of the app. In additio...
Post a Comment
Read more

In-display sensors or facial scanners: which will take off?

The fingerprint sensor may be moving back to the front...under the screen. Could this be the next big trend in mobile technology (see previous entry about current trend)? Or, will companies move the Apple way and opt for facial recognition for security? With the debut of the iPhone X, Apple shifted away from the fingerprint sensor and debuted FaceID. Utilizing (arguably) some of the most advanced cameras and sensors, the iPhone X negated the need for fingerprint, bio-metric security by using 3D facial recognition to verify identity. In doing so, the home button vanished from the iPhone along with the ability to scan fingerprints. Several months later, at CES, Vivo demoed the first phone using in-display fingerprint scanner technology ; the idea being to remove bezels on the front as well remove the sensor from the back of the body. Prior to CES, many believed that Samsung would be the first to debut the technology, but they were held back by mass-producing and technological restra...
Post a Comment
Read more