Skip to main content

RCS (Chat) may finally push carriers to give us the plans we really want

Image result for google rcs chat
IMAGE: TechAdviser.co
When The Verge first released its exclusive analysis on the future of Google messaging including the seeming death of Allo, the branding of Chat, and the push toward RCS, I did not think too much of it. After all, I had been reading about Rich Communication Services as the successor to Short Message Service for years; the popularity of apps such as WhatsApp, Messenger, and iMessage showed that people loved the feeling of more personalized messages. Uncompressed pictures and stickers were just the beginning of what RCS was capable as in-thread boarding passes started to become a reality.


Unfortunately, as is always the case, carriers and companies could not agree on a profile for universal RCS leading to no direction and no adoption; Apple sitting comfortably on the outside with the exclusivity of iMessage did not help the matter either. However, Google with Chat seems to have put RCS back on track. As noted in the article, many carriers and manufacturers have finally agreed on a profile putting the adoption of RCS in to the realm of possibility; it is worth noting that, for the most part, the US is the only one still riding SMS as the primary "texting" app.

Image result for rich communication services
IMAGE: Questechie
I know, I know; we are probably years off from full adoption of RCS. But, within the realm of forward-thinking, I wonder how current carrier plans will change. For instance, while unlimited has made a huge comeback (thanks un-carrier), most plans consist of a limited data amount with unlimited talk and text (SMS/MMS). This means that customers can call and text as much as they want while having limited amount of data for uses such as browsing, shopping, or video chatting, and these plans work well currently because people can call and text. However, that works because "texting" as we know it uses SMS which is limitlessly free.

But what happens when RCS is the main type of "texting"?

If you didn't already know or guess, RCS messages are sent using data, much like Messenger, unlike SMS messages. With that in mind, if RCS becomes the default standard and plans do not adjust, there will be plenty of pissed off customers that are out of data from texting while getting an unlimited allotment of messages they can no longer use (Android Messages will use RCS by default). This makes me think that if/when RCS becomes the default, universal texting profile, we may see a change in mobile plans.

Image result for facebook messenger
IMAGE: Android Police

Quite honestly, I wish plans would change right now; I would gladly have a very limited number of SMS with unlimited data and call for the price I am paying now. If that were the case, I would use another messenger and be content. Unfortunately, that is not the case currently, but I do see a future in which that may become the norm.

People seem to be flocking to apps such as WhatsApp, Messenger, and iMessage at a substantial rate making SMS less relevant. In the day of RCS, SMS will have no relevance (nor even exist). When people think of texting, they will actually be thinking of RCS rather than SMS as they do now. SMS has only survived this long because it is the only true cross-platform messaging standard. Not everyone has WhatsApp, Allo, iMessage, or Messenger, but they do have SMS. Regardless of carrier, manufacturer, or operating system, SMS will work. But, the technology is so antiquated and limited that it does not belong in the same era of today's mobile devices; that is why Google, through Chat, is pushing towards a new standard of messaging that is both appropriate for today's standards as well as reliable for universal use.

RCS and Chat are the future of "texting"; SMS has simply come to the end of relevance. At some point, carriers will also need to realize this so I definitely wonder the plans of tomorrow will look like. Will we finally start seeing carrier plans we actually want: unlimited calls and data standard.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Self-Driving Cars

The future of the world seems to be autonomous. We have reached a point that the future is going to be in Artificial Intelligence; Google has even said they are an AI-first company. The idea behind this push is for machines to learn and adapt to our needs. We want machines to work easily for us. One category of machines that is being pushed to work for us (and without us) is automobiles. Even when transportation consisted of horses pulling a buggy, humans have always been "behind the wheel". By that, I mean that humans have always controlled where, when, why, and how a vehicle will be moving. We have now reached a point where the future will consist of cars that control speed and direction without the need for human control. Aside from convenience, the main reason for the push: removing human error. It is no surprise that the vast majority of automobile accidents can be traced back to human error. Whether it is not watching the road, driving too fast, or simple reckless b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Roseanne, Roseanne. Thank you for demonstrating why you should think before posting

IMAGE: Getty Images (Composite from PageSix) A while back, I wrote a piece encouraging people to be mindful of their digital footprint and the things they say and do on social media. As someone who has seen some very questionable things posted online, I thought it was important to encourage others to take caution with what they share. As for those who are forced to see and hear another's ridiculous thoughts, I wrote a  piece  just days ago about the ability to unfollow and avoid others so that you are not forced to suffer through their farcical thoughts. Now, imagine my delight this morning, when I happen to stumble upon article after article detailing the nonsensical and inflammatory remarks on Twitter made by this country's most obnoxious T.V. mom. For those who may not have caught up on the news this morning, Roseanne Barr decided to enjoy her Memorial Day weekend by tweeting every ridiculous thought to come through her narrow mind ranging from accusations against Geo...
Post a Comment
Read more

iPhone 7

It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...
Post a Comment
Read more