Skip to main content

Celebrating the 20th Anniversary of the iMac

In a special post today, I just want to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the original iMac; the actual date was just a few days ago. Now, I am certainly not an Apple fanboy anymore, and in fact, I think many of their products have a tendency to be overrated. Having said that, whether you love or hate Apple, you can certainly appreciate and admire the revolutionary product that was the iMac.

Just over 20 years ago, personal computing was still in its infancy; my family had just gotten a computer only a few years prior to 1998. At the time, many computers (like today's phones) were incredibly similar. They all featured standard features such a few MB of RAM, a few MB of storage, standard floppy disc drive, a thousand wires protruding from the back, and the same basic beige color.

Around this same time, Apple was essentially just hanging on to relevancy and profitability. Founder Steve Jobs had just returned after his founding of Next (after being kicked out of Apple), and the company was looking for something that would help them avoid becoming just another tech company to go under.

And then, enter the iMac; the very first product from Apple to feature the "i" moniker.  A beautiful, transparent blue-backed box with a single cord (minus the mouse and keyboard) snaking its way from the back, the iMac stood out as much as Shaq at a preschool. The iMac was as different as it possibly could get. The screen and internal components were in the same housing; there was no seperate monitor that needed to attach to a tower both with their own power cables. The speakers were housed in that same body so no audio cables or boxy, space-consuming speakers. The circular puck-looking mouse was as different as that blue body that had no business being on the body of working machine. The iMac was truly the coming-out-party for Jony Ive.

Not only was this appliance truly a design marvel of the the time, but it did something that Apple has become known for over the years for good and bad: it removed a known standard component. Yes, in 1998, the floppy disc was storage juggernaut of the day, and that disc slot was on every PC manufactured at the time...until the iMac. In now-standard Apple fashion, they took a risk in removing the disc drive and going with a lesser known standard identified only as USB. Inconvenient for many at the time, but a daring choice that ultimately paid off. It may not have been the headphone jack decision of its time, but it certainly was a risk that could have derailed the entire product and possibly the company.

Apple heavily marketed the iMac and shaped as a PC in its own league. They sought to make the iMac as the everyman's functional and convenient appliance. Commercials sought to highlight the simplicity and speed in which you could have the iMac running with you surfing the web-of-the-day. Simply plug it in, turn it on, and get rolling using one of the two included browsers: Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator. As opposed to those other computers that would take at least 15-20 minutes to unpackage, get set up, and get browsing, the iMac could have you online in minutes. It just worked, and it just worked quickly.

Love them or hate them, Apple is certainly at the top as far as profitability and brand loyalty is concerned, but just 20 years ago, they were floundering. The iMac, and later the iPhone of course, saved the company. The iMac was truly a revolutionary product that changed the way we view the visual design of electronics; it made aesthetics a key part of the equation of design. So, 20 years later, we can celebrate the first real product from Apple that was truthfully revolutionary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital well-being is the trend of the year

Digital well-being is this year's buzzword With the keynote of WWDC officially over, it is safe to say one thing: digital well-being is the trendy topic of the year. I/O last month and WWDC have demonstrated that the key players in mobile devices (seemingly) want you to put your phone down. However, which company has the right idea in how to do it? Both iOS 12 and Android P have showcased coming features to address "digital well-being". For all intents and purposes, these words just mean that Apple and Google "want" you to spend less time on your phone; at least, that is the image they are portraying. Both iOS and Android offer new dashboards Now, how are they both doing it? While they differ in the approach, they have very similar tools. For instance, both operating systems will allow you to set timers on apps so that you can spend as much or as little times in those apps as you choose. If you go over, you get shut out of the app. In additio...

In-display sensors or facial scanners: which will take off?

The fingerprint sensor may be moving back to the front...under the screen. Could this be the next big trend in mobile technology (see previous entry about current trend)? Or, will companies move the Apple way and opt for facial recognition for security? With the debut of the iPhone X, Apple shifted away from the fingerprint sensor and debuted FaceID. Utilizing (arguably) some of the most advanced cameras and sensors, the iPhone X negated the need for fingerprint, bio-metric security by using 3D facial recognition to verify identity. In doing so, the home button vanished from the iPhone along with the ability to scan fingerprints. Several months later, at CES, Vivo demoed the first phone using in-display fingerprint scanner technology ; the idea being to remove bezels on the front as well remove the sensor from the back of the body. Prior to CES, many believed that Samsung would be the first to debut the technology, but they were held back by mass-producing and technological restra...

Checking in on me?

Admittedly, it has been a slower news day in my tech sphere, and I have not had a ton of time to do more research. But I find myself wondering tonight: how many people check in, and do you think it is a good idea to do so? While I understand privacy concerns, I leave my life mainly open for the public. I tend to share my life with the world through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. At any given time, those in my circle on social media know where I am, what I am doing, and who I am doing it with. Why do I do this  you ask? Is it vanity of making others jealous, or is it simply to let others know? Well, honestly, it is a little both. The most important issue others see with this lifestyle is that I am letting the entire world know where I am. I get the hesitation with checking in on social media. For instance, if someone would wish to harm me for some strange reason, they would know where to find me. Also, if someone would desire to rob me, they would know that I am not home. T...