Skip to main content

13 Reasons Why shows why it is not as easy as blaming technology for our societal problems

Image result for 13 reasons why
IMAGE: IMDB
Let's start with a little background for those that are not familiar. 13 Reasons Why is a Netflix show that follows the story of Hannah Baker, or rather, the story after Hannah Baker. After intense bullying, harassment, and ultimately sexual assault, Hannah takes her own life leaving behind a set of tapes detailing the reasons she committed suicide. In the newly released season two, 13 Reason follows the trial in the lawsuit between Hannah's parents and the school district.

An incredibly graphic show, 13 Reasons leaves little to the imagination. Hannah's suicide is shown fully on screen as are the various depictions of sexual assault including the now controversial scene featuring character Tyler in the season two finale. Designed to instigate discussion about some of the darker sides of society, 13 Reasons Why remains polarizing for how it depicts certain topics; however, one topic that is rarely discussed or mentioned is the affect that technology has on areas such as bullying and harassment which makes it even more topic-worthy.

Image result for 13 reasons why
IMAGE: Popsugar (13 Reasons Why)
From my experience, it seems we are ready to blame the worsening of society on the rise of technological advancement. For instance, I have lost count of the times I have seen people blame an increase in mass shootings on two things: violent video games and media exposure. However, we just don't have the data to pack that statement up. In terms of bullying and teenage suicide, we immediately blame social media and cyber-bullying. Do I think these things play a factor? Of course. However, we cannot just place the blame on technology and act as if there are no other factors at play.

In my opinion, 13 Reasons Why perfectly demonstrates why it is not as simple as blaming technology for a bullying and harassment prevalent culture: technology does not "feature" in much of the show at all. Are there instances of cyber-bullying? Yes, but they are certainly not the center of the issue. In the first season, a picture of Hannah and another girl is circulated throughout school leading to significant harassment which is 100% cyber-bullying. However, the original photo was taken on "old-school" film, and as the second season showed, the pictures could have just as easily been developed, printed, and circulated without a single cell phone coming in to play. It was not social media (as depicted in other movies/shows) that led to the circulation of potentially embarrassing media; it was just traditional, personal interaction.

Image result for 13 reasons why
IMAGE: NME (13 Reasons Why)

Season two drives this point home even harder as nearly all of the bullying and harassment that takes place is either verbal or physical; there is very little digital assault. For instance, look at all the various ways that Montgomery tried to intimidate and bully his classmates:
1) he gave Alex a gun and bullet;
2) he physically attacked Clay;
3) he vandalized Tony's car;
4) he physically and sexually assaulted Tyler.
At no point, in any of these scenarios, did he use technology or social media to harass his classmates. Even in the scenario of Chloe trying to intimidate Jessica, she printed pictures and posted them in the classroom when she could have just as easily anonymously posted them online and allowed them to circulate.

For all the points that 13 Reasons Why makes in terms of how high school culture can be as well as where we stand as a society in terms of gender equality and victim-blaming, one of the largest points it subtlety makes is that technology is neither responsible nor required for harassment and assault. The concept and action of bullying and assaulting existed long before the technological tools we have today, and it will continue to exist as those tools change over time. While it certainly makes it easier to stay anonymous, it is not responsible for the physical manifestations of bullying; those acts are performed by individuals without the safety of screen. it is because of this (and how it is shown in 13 Reason Why) that we cannot simply blame technology for where we are as a culture; that responsibly should stay firmly on our own shoulders.

Comments

  1. I am very greatfull to you as you shared this.I am recently developing associate app spotify hulu
    that is you may have an interest to seem on that :

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

iPhone 7

It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...

Trust Indicators and Fake News

It is no secret that we have a significant "Fake News" problem in the world today. Before everyone starts preparing their defenses for their favorite news sources, let me clarify that I am not talking about "Biased News". As much as President Trump likes to say it, CNN is not actually "Fake News" and neither is FOX, NBC, ABC, et cetera. Biased as these sites may be at times (mostly all the time), the news they are reporting is based in fact; it just has a very biased spin. I would think that functioning adults would be able to tell the difference between: "Trump signs healthcare reform in to law causing issues for middle-class" and "Trump seen punching babies on his way out of gentleman's club" While there is no way for me to know if the second statement ever happened (I highly doubt it), I would assume that most people would understand that one is fake and one is biased. Unfortunately, we seem to have reached a point that peop...

Mobile payments are the future, but how long will it take for us to get there?

We are all understandably protective of our money right? We conceal our cash when we are forced to open our wallets, keep our pin numbers to ourselves, and certainly do not just hand our credit cards off to just anyway. So, along those lines, I am curious how we as a society feel about mobile payments. Now, because I try to keep this blog open and understandable to all, I will not talk about the encryption of mobile payment nor the process of virtual card numbers and the like. I am curious as to the perception of the average person. Personally, I am all for mobile payment, and I love the convenience of simply pulling out my phone and then being on my way. I never have to worry about pulling out my card, trying to figure out whether to slide it or insert it, typing in my number, putting my pin number in, pulling it back out and in my wallet, and putting my wallet away; when I am waiting in line, I often already have my phone out anyway. There is so much potential in mobile payment. ...