We shouldn't fear artificial intelligence...at least not yet
IMAGE: Android Police
I, Robot has finally come true...Robots are alive and now shooting guns; it is time to fear the rise of artificial intelligence.
Or not.
IMAGE: FanPop
As detailed in an article on Engadget today, a video was posted to YouTube demonstrating Google Assistant shooting a gun. The point to be made: it is time to stop thinking about what artificial intelligence could do and start thinking about what it should do. On the surface, the thought of robots powered by artificial intelligence both handling and utilizing firearms is cause for alarm. However, there is much more to this story that makes the story much less fascinating, but it still keeps the mind questioning any practical and moral issues arising from artificial intelligence.
The actual process that led to the phrase, "OK Google, activate gun," actually shooting a gun is quite impressive. As explained, the actual trigger was pulled by a string connected to a coin-dispensing machine linked to a Google Home from a relay typically used for a lamp. Labeling the relay as "gun" and having it activated by the Assistant is what really caused the digital assistant to activate a machine that ultimately pulled the trigger of a gun.
From there, the author of the article makes the point that as artificial intelligence begins to learn our habits, and we display a propensity to activate this action in times of need, digital assistants such as the Assistant, Alexa, and Siri could learn to activate these machines when it perceives our need; essentially, she believes guns may start firing due to ever-helpful assistant as opposed to the direct command of a human.
I truly do understand the point the article is trying to make, but it seems to rest purely on the thoughts of people like Elon Musk who believe we are headed to a dystopian future in which artificial intelligence rises above humankind's intelligence. Unfortunately, I think this is nothing more than fantastical slippery-slope argument, and the article seems to lack any depth in the argument. In all reality, the only action that took place in the video was that someone rigged a system that took advantage of a digital assistant's "hot words" and lack of morality.
IMAGE: Tom's Guide
Now, does it raise the question of what assistants should be allowed to do? Of course. There may come a day where a gun is developed with artificial intelligence which could be programmed to carry out our worst nightmares. Imagine the horror if something like the Las Vegas shooting had been carried out by a rifle that had been controlled remotely by a man that was miles away; we may not have caught him or he may have programmed simultaneous shootings. However, I think that is more of an argument on what actions and orders digital assistants are capable of doing; it speaks nothing towards a future in which artificial intelligence is making the choice to pull the trigger. It all would come down who is responsible for the action based on who made the decision to say, "go". That is a scary thought indeed.
While I find the argument admirable and discussion that needs to happen, I don't believe this video is a cause for concern in terms of robot revolution. Artificial intelligence and digital assistants are becoming more advanced by the day, but they are still simply manifestations of what people put in to them. Of course, we should be looking in to what we allow them to do, but I think we are a long way from Sonny making the decision to harm a human to protect me.
The future of the world seems to be autonomous. We have reached a point that the future is going to be in Artificial Intelligence; Google has even said they are an AI-first company. The idea behind this push is for machines to learn and adapt to our needs. We want machines to work easily for us. One category of machines that is being pushed to work for us (and without us) is automobiles. Even when transportation consisted of horses pulling a buggy, humans have always been "behind the wheel". By that, I mean that humans have always controlled where, when, why, and how a vehicle will be moving. We have now reached a point where the future will consist of cars that control speed and direction without the need for human control. Aside from convenience, the main reason for the push: removing human error. It is no surprise that the vast majority of automobile accidents can be traced back to human error. Whether it is not watching the road, driving too fast, or simple reckless b...
IMAGE: Getty Images (Composite from PageSix) A while back, I wrote a piece encouraging people to be mindful of their digital footprint and the things they say and do on social media. As someone who has seen some very questionable things posted online, I thought it was important to encourage others to take caution with what they share. As for those who are forced to see and hear another's ridiculous thoughts, I wrote a piece just days ago about the ability to unfollow and avoid others so that you are not forced to suffer through their farcical thoughts. Now, imagine my delight this morning, when I happen to stumble upon article after article detailing the nonsensical and inflammatory remarks on Twitter made by this country's most obnoxious T.V. mom. For those who may not have caught up on the news this morning, Roseanne Barr decided to enjoy her Memorial Day weekend by tweeting every ridiculous thought to come through her narrow mind ranging from accusations against Geo...
It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...
Comments
Post a Comment