Skip to main content

We shouldn't fear artificial intelligence...at least not yet





Image result for google assistant shoots
IMAGE: Android Police
I, Robot has finally come true...Robots are alive and now shooting guns; it is time to fear the rise of artificial intelligence.
Or not.
Image result for sonny irobot
IMAGE: FanPop
As detailed in an article on Engadget today, a video was posted to YouTube demonstrating Google Assistant shooting a gun. The point to be made: it is time to stop thinking about what artificial intelligence could do and start thinking about what it should do. On the surface, the thought of robots powered by artificial intelligence both handling and utilizing firearms is cause for alarm. However, there is much more to this story that makes the story much less fascinating, but it still keeps the mind questioning any practical and moral issues arising from artificial intelligence.

The actual process that led to the phrase, "OK Google, activate gun," actually shooting a gun is quite impressive. As explained, the actual trigger was pulled by a string connected to a coin-dispensing machine linked to a Google Home from a relay typically used for a lamp. Labeling the relay as "gun" and having it activated by the Assistant is what really caused the digital assistant to activate a machine that ultimately pulled the trigger of a gun.
From there, the author of the article makes the point that as artificial intelligence begins to learn our habits, and we display a propensity to activate this action in times of need, digital assistants such as the Assistant, Alexa, and Siri could learn to activate these machines when it perceives our need; essentially, she believes guns may start firing due to ever-helpful assistant as opposed to the direct command of a human.

I truly do understand the point the article is trying to make, but it seems to rest purely on the thoughts of people like Elon Musk who believe we are headed to a dystopian future in which artificial intelligence rises above humankind's intelligence. Unfortunately, I think this is nothing more than fantastical slippery-slope argument, and the article seems to lack any depth in the  argument. In all reality, the only action that took place in the video was that someone rigged a system that took advantage of a digital assistant's "hot words" and lack of morality.

Image result for google assistant shoots
IMAGE: Tom's Guide
Now, does it raise the question of what assistants should be allowed to do? Of course. There may come a day where a gun is developed with artificial intelligence which could be programmed to carry out our worst nightmares. Imagine the horror if something like the Las Vegas shooting had been carried out by a rifle that had been controlled remotely by a man that was miles away; we may not have caught him or he may have programmed simultaneous shootings. However, I think that is more of an argument on what actions and orders digital assistants are capable of doing; it speaks nothing towards a future in which artificial intelligence is making the choice to pull the trigger. It all would come down who is responsible for the action based on who made the decision to say, "go". That is a scary thought indeed.

While I find the argument admirable and discussion that needs to happen, I don't believe this video is a cause for concern in terms of robot revolution. Artificial intelligence and digital assistants are becoming more advanced by the day, but they are still simply manifestations of what people put in to them. Of course, we should be looking in to what we allow them to do, but I think we are a long way from Sonny making the decision to harm a human to protect me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trust Indicators and Fake News

It is no secret that we have a significant "Fake News" problem in the world today. Before everyone starts preparing their defenses for their favorite news sources, let me clarify that I am not talking about "Biased News". As much as President Trump likes to say it, CNN is not actually "Fake News" and neither is FOX, NBC, ABC, et cetera. Biased as these sites may be at times (mostly all the time), the news they are reporting is based in fact; it just has a very biased spin. I would think that functioning adults would be able to tell the difference between: "Trump signs healthcare reform in to law causing issues for middle-class" and "Trump seen punching babies on his way out of gentleman's club" While there is no way for me to know if the second statement ever happened (I highly doubt it), I would assume that most people would understand that one is fake and one is biased. Unfortunately, we seem to have reached a point that peop...

iPhone 7

It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...

Mobile payments are the future, but how long will it take for us to get there?

We are all understandably protective of our money right? We conceal our cash when we are forced to open our wallets, keep our pin numbers to ourselves, and certainly do not just hand our credit cards off to just anyway. So, along those lines, I am curious how we as a society feel about mobile payments. Now, because I try to keep this blog open and understandable to all, I will not talk about the encryption of mobile payment nor the process of virtual card numbers and the like. I am curious as to the perception of the average person. Personally, I am all for mobile payment, and I love the convenience of simply pulling out my phone and then being on my way. I never have to worry about pulling out my card, trying to figure out whether to slide it or insert it, typing in my number, putting my pin number in, pulling it back out and in my wallet, and putting my wallet away; when I am waiting in line, I often already have my phone out anyway. There is so much potential in mobile payment. ...