Skip to main content

ESPN+ cannot carry the team

As a writer, as well as a believer in the power of good journalism, I would never attempt to tear apart someone else's material nor I would knowingly attempt to discredit anyone's credentials. However, in the interest of fairness and honesty, I will at times offer a rebuttal to someone's op-ed piece that simply seems to fall flat while attempting to be persuasive. In all honesty, I would expect someone to do the same for me.

In the interest of respect, I will not link the article nor name the author or publication, but the summary of the article is that ESPN+ is an essential and worthwhile investment for those who love sports and are cutting the cord on cable. The problem is that the author did not make an argument even close to sufficient to make the point that it is essential for sports enthusiasts; the entirety of their argument centered around the fact that more soccer would be available for everyone. While this is great for soccer fans (which I consider myself at times), it does not even remotely make a strong case for ESPN+ because there really is no good argument for ESPN+ currently.
Image result for espn+ logo
ESPN+ Logo

If you are not a sports fan, or do not watch ESPN, you may have no idea what ESPN+ even means. Basically, it is a standalone streaming service from ESPN (Disney) that offers (for $5 a month) various sports programming that is not carried on the main ESPN family of programs. Those sports will basically range from soccer to various college sports to some MLB regional broadcasts that are not blacked out. Like WatchESPN, the additional service offered to ESPN cable subscribers, you say? Not even close because while WatchESPN has all of the programming on ESPN networks as well as additional programming such as ESPNU, ESPN+ currently only gets the programming that will not be featured on any of the ESPN networks. Also, if you like any programming such as SportsCenter, Get Up!, or Golic and Wingo, forget about it because those are only on "regular" ESPN.

Thankfully, Disney had the sense to make it clear this was simply a complementary service to ESPN and not designed to stand on its own; I just wish the author of the article had had the sense to make sure people understood that (full disclosure, they hastily put that in the last paragraph of the article). For those who love all sports and watch them 24/7, ESPN+ could be a good use of $5 a month as it will get you access to the equivalent of ESPN8. However, for those of us who love sports other than soccer and archived streams of games long-since-passed, ESPN+ is certainly not yet ready to be our end-all-be-all of sports entertainment and may never be that. Pretending that it is, and even making the case that it is based on a specific preference, will lead to a lot of cord-cutters unsatisfied...that is until they launch a new studio show featuring Cotton McKnight and Pepper Brooks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Self-Driving Cars

The future of the world seems to be autonomous. We have reached a point that the future is going to be in Artificial Intelligence; Google has even said they are an AI-first company. The idea behind this push is for machines to learn and adapt to our needs. We want machines to work easily for us. One category of machines that is being pushed to work for us (and without us) is automobiles. Even when transportation consisted of horses pulling a buggy, humans have always been "behind the wheel". By that, I mean that humans have always controlled where, when, why, and how a vehicle will be moving. We have now reached a point where the future will consist of cars that control speed and direction without the need for human control. Aside from convenience, the main reason for the push: removing human error. It is no surprise that the vast majority of automobile accidents can be traced back to human error. Whether it is not watching the road, driving too fast, or simple reckless b...

Roseanne, Roseanne. Thank you for demonstrating why you should think before posting

IMAGE: Getty Images (Composite from PageSix) A while back, I wrote a piece encouraging people to be mindful of their digital footprint and the things they say and do on social media. As someone who has seen some very questionable things posted online, I thought it was important to encourage others to take caution with what they share. As for those who are forced to see and hear another's ridiculous thoughts, I wrote a  piece  just days ago about the ability to unfollow and avoid others so that you are not forced to suffer through their farcical thoughts. Now, imagine my delight this morning, when I happen to stumble upon article after article detailing the nonsensical and inflammatory remarks on Twitter made by this country's most obnoxious T.V. mom. For those who may not have caught up on the news this morning, Roseanne Barr decided to enjoy her Memorial Day weekend by tweeting every ridiculous thought to come through her narrow mind ranging from accusations against Geo...

iPhone 7

It is that time again: Apple has launched a new iPhone, and the masses will flock tomorrow to get their hands on the "best one yet". However, I believe that this line is beginning to be slightly misleading. Is it the best iPhone? Yes. Is it the best phone? I would say no. At the same time, I do believe that it is a solid device. Admittedly, I have not had an iPhone since 4; I also had a MacBook Pro and iPad 2 at the time. I used to be fully in the iCorner. I believed that the ecosystem they designed was unbeatable, and their hardware was second-to-none. These days I have a slightly different perspective. That is a different story, however. Let's look at the iPhone 7 (and plus) just on its own merits. In the days of 6" plus screens, built in DSLR's (hyperbole), and pixel-less screens, the iPhone is a jack-of-all trades, master of none. I have not personally tested the phone, but like all tech announcements, I watched the live streaming event. I did not see any...