Skip to main content

What does the T-Mobile and Sprint merger mean for you?

Well, after two previous failed attempts, it has finally happened: T-Mobile and Sprint have announced merger...maybe. While both companies are calling this a merger, essentially T-Mobile is buying out Sprint to the tune of $26.5 billion, and the carried we now know as Sprint will cease to exist. Officially, nothing has been finalized yet as the merger still needs to clear the massive hurdle that is regulatory approval by both the FCC and the DOJ; this was wall that halted the sale of T-Mobile to AT&T several years ago.

While the deal is far from official at this point, and this whole situation could dissolve eventually, let's operate on the premise that this deal does clear the review, and the merger becomes final. What then does that due for the customers of both companies. In the short term, not really a damn thing. At the earliest, the deal would be finalized in roughly a year or so, and it would take a few years for implementation. Basically, don't even start to think about it until at least 2022. At that point, then some changes may start to show up.

For existing Sprint customers, congratulations because you are now a T-Mobile customer; T-Mobile would have close to 90 million customers now putting them close to AT&T. T-Mobile has claimed that the shift would happen gradually and seamlessly with the goal of no service issues during the transition. In fact, according to T-Mobile, over 20 million customers with Sprint have devices that are already T-Mobile capable so good for those customers. As for Sprint's CDMA voice technology, it would be transitioned to VoLTE leaving Verizon as the only big player using CDMA technology.

So what are some of the proposed benefits? Well, T-Mobile and Sprint claim this would help them assist the United States in being a leader in the adoption of 5G as well as giving them a massive amount of spectrum that can be used to reach those in rural America. In addition, the companies claim by combining forces, they can push faster speeds and lower costs; they even claim to be keeping the "Uncarrier" model with no service contracts and/or hidden fees.

Are these benefits really true? Well, that remains to be seen. Competition has always been good for customers as it forces carriers to offer better services and lower prices to gain traction in the market. T-Mobile claims that by growing to be on par with the big boys in terms of size, they can force prices down for everyone with stronger competition. However, it could ultimately end up leading to increased prices as there will be less competition and no scrappy underdogs to keep the head honchos honest. In addition, market consolidation tends to create a company or companies that become too large to control or abandon. When someone was sick of Verizon or AT&T, they could go to T-Mobile, Sprint, or a smaller carrier. Now, the market will have only three competitors that would be so large they determine the rules.

Will this deal be bad for the consumer? It is too early to say even if it does go through. T-Mobile and Sprint have said some great things that customers love to hear, but those are schmoozing words to get the deal to go through. If it passes, the next few years will be very telling in how the market will shift. The only thing we really know for sure, if the merger is approved, is that Paul will have to change the color of his shirt again, and he will have a whole new set of people to ask if they can hear him now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Where do tablets belong?

Last night, I had a sudden thought: where does my tablet belong in my tech life? I have always loved the thought of having a need and purpose for every piece of technology I own. For instance, my computer does all of my heavy lifting (photo and video editing) while my phone does all of communicating and daily living tasks. My Chromecast ? That is for tossing music and videos to my TV. Google Home Mini ? What a great little assistant for quick information and getting my day started. I use my Xbox for gaming while my Huawei Watch gives me quick updates and almost-hands-free communication. So, where does my Kindle come in? I originally bought my Kindle Fire to be a consumption device and makeshift pseudo-laptop as mine is not very portable. I thought I would use it for all of Netflix watching as I moved about the house as well as for reading plenty of books; I even intended it to be useful to bang out a quick blog post or article. We probably had a great relationship at first...and ...

Digital well-being is the trend of the year

Digital well-being is this year's buzzword With the keynote of WWDC officially over, it is safe to say one thing: digital well-being is the trendy topic of the year. I/O last month and WWDC have demonstrated that the key players in mobile devices (seemingly) want you to put your phone down. However, which company has the right idea in how to do it? Both iOS 12 and Android P have showcased coming features to address "digital well-being". For all intents and purposes, these words just mean that Apple and Google "want" you to spend less time on your phone; at least, that is the image they are portraying. Both iOS and Android offer new dashboards Now, how are they both doing it? While they differ in the approach, they have very similar tools. For instance, both operating systems will allow you to set timers on apps so that you can spend as much or as little times in those apps as you choose. If you go over, you get shut out of the app. In additio...

In-display sensors or facial scanners: which will take off?

The fingerprint sensor may be moving back to the front...under the screen. Could this be the next big trend in mobile technology (see previous entry about current trend)? Or, will companies move the Apple way and opt for facial recognition for security? With the debut of the iPhone X, Apple shifted away from the fingerprint sensor and debuted FaceID. Utilizing (arguably) some of the most advanced cameras and sensors, the iPhone X negated the need for fingerprint, bio-metric security by using 3D facial recognition to verify identity. In doing so, the home button vanished from the iPhone along with the ability to scan fingerprints. Several months later, at CES, Vivo demoed the first phone using in-display fingerprint scanner technology ; the idea being to remove bezels on the front as well remove the sensor from the back of the body. Prior to CES, many believed that Samsung would be the first to debut the technology, but they were held back by mass-producing and technological restra...